Skip to Content
ProcessesAction LearningFormulate Insight

Formulate Insight: Pattern Analysis Guide

Formulate Insight is Quadrant 2 of the action-learning methodology. This is where you analyze your Ground Truth data to identify themes, patterns, and root causes.

What is an Insight?

Insight = A deeper understanding of why problems exist

  • Not just listing problems
  • Understanding underlying patterns
  • Identifying root causes
  • Recognizing “superior interests” (what people really need)

The Analysis Process

Step 1: Consolidate Data

If Individual: Review all your interview notes and voice notes

If Team: Combine research from all team members

  • Pool all voice notes
  • Share interview summaries
  • Compare observation notes
  • Look for overlaps and contradictions

Step 2: Identify Themes

Theme = A recurring topic across multiple interviews

How to Find Themes:

  1. List all problems mentioned
  2. Group similar problems together
  3. Name each group (e.g., “Access Issues”, “Cost Barriers”, “Trust Problems”)
  4. Count frequency (how many people mentioned this?)

Example Themes:

  • Waste Management: “Lack of collection services in low-income areas”
  • Transportation: “First-mile/last-mile gaps in public transit”
  • Healthcare: “Distrust of formal medical facilities”

Step 3: Find Root Causes

Root Cause = Why the problem exists, not just the symptom

Use “5 Whys” Technique:

Example:

  • Problem: Market traders can’t save money
  • Why? No banks nearby
  • Why? Banks avoid low-income areas
  • Why? High operational costs for physical branches
  • Why? Traditional banking model not profitable for small accounts
  • Root Cause: Banking system designed for high-value customers, excludes low-income earners

Step 4: Identify Superior Interests

Superior Interest = The underlying need beneath surface problems

People might say they want X, but they actually need Y.

Example:

  • Surface request: “We need more garbage trucks”
  • Superior interest: “We need a system that actually removes waste consistently”
  • Better solution might be: Community collection points, waste-to-value programs, or private collection services

Documentation Format

On your team page (/team/[your-team]/formulate-insight), document:

1. Key Themes

List 3-5 major themes with:

  • Theme name
  • Evidence (quote count, voice note references)
  • Affected population

2. Root Cause Analysis

For each theme:

  • Surface problem
  • Underlying causes
  • Contributing factors

3. Superior Interests

What does the community actually need?

  • Beyond surface requests
  • Validated by research
  • Addresses root causes

Quality Checklist

âś… Themes supported by multiple interviews
âś… Root causes go beyond surface symptoms
âś… Evidence cited (quotes, voice notes)
âś… Patterns validated across diverse interviewees
âś… Superior interests clearly articulated

Common Mistakes

❌ Jumping to Solutions - “The insight is that they need an app”
❌ Superficial Analysis - Stopping at first-level problems
❌ Ignoring Contradictions - Cherry-picking data that fits your bias
❌ Weak Evidence - “We think…” instead of “Data shows…”
❌ Over-generalizing - “Everyone wants…” based on 3 interviews

Example: Good vs. Bad Insight

❌ Bad Example

“Our insight is that people need a better waste management app. We’ll build one.”

Problems: This is a solution, not an insight. No root cause analysis.

âś… Good Example

“Theme: Waste accumulation in markets. Root cause: Municipal services prioritize residential areas over commercial markets due to budget constraints. Merchants willing to pay for private collection but lack coordination. Superior interest: Reliable, consistent waste removal they control, even if not free.”

Strengths: Clear theme, root cause identified, superior interest defined, implies solution direction without prescribing it yet

Analysis Tools

Affinity Mapping

  1. Write each problem/quote on separate note
  2. Group similar items together
  3. Name each cluster
  4. Identify patterns across clusters

Fishbone Diagram (Ishikawa)

Problem | --------.-------- | | | Cause Cause Cause | | | Detail Detail Detail

Map contributing causes to understand complexity

Moving Forward

Once you have solid insights:

  1. Document thoroughly on your team page
  2. Validate with mentors during check-ins
  3. Move to Quadrant 3: Formulate Hypothesis

Formulate Hypothesis Guide →


Remember: Good insights reveal why problems exist, not just what problems are. This understanding guides better solutions.

Last updated on